Hanford on Lord Campbell and the Fatal Accidents Act

Credit
Peter Handford, University of Western Australia Faculty of Law, has posted Lord Campbell and the Fatal Accidents Act, which appears in Law Quarterly Review 129 (21013): 420.  Here is the abstract:    
The object of this article is to examine the events that led to the creation of the Fatal Accidents Act and Lord Campbell’s part in them. It will therefore first briefly review his life and career, and then look in more detail at the old law, its replacement by the new law contained in the Fatal Accidents Act, and the extent of the reform.

Bernabe on the Theoretical Foundation and Historical Origin of the Tort Remedy for Invasion of Privacy

Alberto Bernabe (John Marshall Law School) has posted "Giving Credit Where Credit Is Due: A Comment on the Theoretical Foundation and Historical Origin of the Tort Remedy for Invasion of Privacy," which was published in 2012 in the John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law. Here's the abstract:
In 1890 Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis published The Right to Privacy, which is considered by many to be the most influential law review article in the history of American tort law. Years later, in another famous and influential law review article, William Prosser attempted to complete the work of Warren and Brandeis. His proposal for a new understanding of the right to privacy, however, contradicted Warren and Brandeis’ understanding of it and, in fact, altered the character of the concept. Nevertheless, it was later adopted in the Restatement of the Law Second. Thus the traditional view of the origin of the concept of a privacy tort is that it was created by Warren and Brandeis and refined by Prosser. Although partially correct, this explanation tells only a small part of a more complex and interesting story. A more careful reading of the story shows that the article by Warren and Brandeis has been given more credit than it deserves and that Prosser’s attempt to organize the notion of a privacy torts into a small number of categories was, at best, counterproductive. The real origin of the concept of privacy as an interest that deserves protection in tort law was the common law of torts itself, best exemplified by a decision of the Michigan Supreme Court published nine years before Warren and Brandeis’ article. The right to privacy was not born in a law review article. It was born the day an uninvited stranger happened to be present when a woman was having a baby at home. It is important to give credit where credit is due; not to Prosser, not to Warren & Brandeis but to Chief Justice Marston who, in DeMay v. Roberts, was the real precursor to what we now refer to as the right to privacy.
The full article is available here.

Weekend Roundup

Image credit
  • The Spring 2013 issue of the Green Bag is out. LHB readers may be particularly interested in G. Edward White's piece on "the ALI's recent history and current challenges." 
  • Back in April, Kurt Newman (Ph.D. candidate, University of California, Santa Barbara) wrote a series of posts for the U.S. Intellectual History Blog on “Pragmatism and the Class Politics of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.’s Copyright Jurisprudence.” Check it out here.
  • From the Canadian Legal History Blog: an announcement of this year's article and book prize winners from the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History.
The Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.

Welke to Lecture on "The Cowboy Suit Tragedy"

The Law, Culture, and Humanities Initiative at the University of Oregon announces The Cowboy Suit Tragedy: Spreading Risk, Owning Hazard in the Twentieth Century U.S. Consumer Economy, a talk by Barbara Young Welke, professor of law and history at the University of Minnesota.  It will take place Friday, May 10, 2013 at 12:30 p.m. in Lewis Lounge, Knight Law Center.

Blog Archive