Barrett at the Naming of the Robert H. Jackson US Courthouse

Credit
John Q. Barrett, St. John's University School of Law and the Robert H. Jackson Center, has posted his remarks at the naming ceremony for the Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse, Buffalo, New York, on September 30, 2013.  Here is the abstract:
The text describes Robert Jackson’s life path, including his two years (1917-1918) living and practicing law in Buffalo near what is today the Jackson Courthouse site in the heart of downtown Niagara Square; his late 1918 confidence that leaving Buffalo, one of the nation’s great cities, to live and practice law in much smaller Jamestown, New York, would work out for the best; his legacy today in special places and buildings, including courthouses throughout the U.S. and internationally, including in Nuremberg, Germany; and his high regard, expressed in 1937 to a friend who was a new Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, for the significant work of U.S. District Judges.

This file includes photographs of Jackson’s former office and apartment buildings in Buffalo, him with his son and WDNY Judge Harold P. Burke, and the new Jackson Courthouse.

New Release: Flaherty, "Public Law, Private Practice: Politics, Profit, and the Legal Profession in Nineteenth-Century Japan"

The Harvard University Asia Center has released Public Law, Private Practice: Politics, Profit, and the Legal Profession in Nineteenth-Century Japan (2013), by Darryl E. Flaherty (University of Delaware). A description from the publisher:
Long ignored by historians and repudiated in their time, practitioners of private law opened the way toward Japan’s legal modernity. From the seventeenth to the turn of the twentieth century, lawyers and their predecessors changed society in ways that first samurai and then the state could not. During the Edo period (1600–1868), they worked from the shadows to bend the shogun’s law to suit the market needs of merchants and the justice concerns of peasants. Over the course of the nineteenth century, legal practitioners changed law from a tool for rule into a new epistemology and laid the foundation for parliamentary politics during the Meiji era (1868–1912).

This social and political history argues that legal modernity sprouted from indigenous roots and helped delineate a budding nation’s public and private spheres. Tracing the transition of law regimes from Edo to Meiji, Darryl E. Flaherty shows how the legal profession emerged as a force for change in modern Japan and highlights its lasting contributions in founding private universities, political parties, and a national association of lawyers that contributed to legal reform during the twentieth century.

Pearce and Jenoff on "How the Legal Profession's Twenty-First Century Challenges Resemble Those of the Turn of the Twentieth Century"

Russell G. Pearce (Fordham University School of Law) and Pam Jenoff (Rutgers School of Law - Camden) have posted "Nothing New Under the Sun: How the Legal Profession's Twenty-First Century Challenges Resemble Those of the Turn of the Twentieth Century," which was recently published in the Fordham Urban Law Journal. Here's the abstract:
Drawing upon Julius Henry Cohen’s classic 1916 work, 'The Law: Business or Profession?', this Essay explains that the challenges facing the legal profession today are not new and that in current debates lawyers, judges, and law professors too often rely on inaccurate assumptions regarding the history of the legal profession. In particular, this Essay identifies five crises facing the legal profession today that parallel challenges at the turn of the Twentieth Century: (1) determining whether law is a business or a profession; (2) debating whether lawyers have responsibility for civic and business leadership; (3) considering whether lawyers should have control of the market for legal services; (4) promoting reform of legal education; and (5) managing increased diversity. The Essay argues that placing these crises in historical context reveals that the legal profession’s responses to these dilemmas have varied over time, suggests that today’s status quo is neither traditional nor inevitable, and seeks to create space for rethinking assumptions that underpin our current debates.
The full article is available here, at SSRN.

Mark on "The Unlikely Persistence of the Legal Services Corporation"

Alyx Mark (George Washington University - Department of Political Science) has posted "The Unlikely Persistence of the Legal Services Corporation: The Politics of Bureaucratic Control," a paper from the 2013 meeting of the American Political Science Association. Here's the abstract:
The Legal Services Corporation (LSC) was created in 1974 to replace the Office of Economic Opportunity’s (OEO) Legal Services Program through the enactment of the LSC Act. The original act was enacted under a Republican president and a Democratic majority in Congress and since has been subject to extreme budget cuts, zero funding threats, and tighter restrictions to its organizational mandate. Despite all of these challenges, the LSC persists as the single largest grant maker and monitor of the provision of civil legal services to the poor in the United States. While there has been historical work done on the formation of the LSC via the LSC Act, political science has not fully given consideration to the LSC as an interesting case of institutional stickiness. Despite the numerous threats to the LSC’s survival over time, the LSC persists, even through periods of Republican control. When is the LSC limited through restrictions to its mandate, independence, and funding? How does the LSC evolve and who joins coalitions supporting these changes? What reasoning is provided in support of changes? Informed by a bureaucratic control framework, I begin to investigate trends in political attention to the LSC by employing both an overview of the LSC’s political history as well as a new dataset highlighting the content of introductions concerning the LSC.
The full paper is available here, at SSRN.

Women in the Life and Law of the DC Circuit Courts

Just up on the website of the Historical Society of the DC Circuit is a video of  Women in the Life and Law of the DC Circuit Courts, a program the Society sponsored in June.  The website explains:
Led by the moderator, Professor Barbara Babcock,  panelists Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Judge Gladys Kessler, Judge  Royce Lamberth, Nancy Mayer-Whittington, Michele Roberts, Judge Patricia Wald, and Helgi Walker assessed the role of women in the life and law of the Courts.  In so doing, they described their professional and personal experiences while providing insights into the participation of women in the Courts of the Circuit, hurdles encountered and remaining, and the impact of women participating in increasing numbers in the judicial process.

Cushman on the Four Horsemen's Clerks

John Knox, McReynolds Clerk
Barry Cushman, Notre Dame Law School, has posted The Clerks of the Four Horsemen.  Here is the abstract:    
The names of Holmes clerks such as Tommy Corcoran and Francis Biddle, of Brandeis clerks such as Dean Acheson and Henry Friendly, and of Stone clerks such as Harold Leventhal and Herbert Wechsler ring down the pages of history. But how much do we really know about Carlyle Baer, Tench Marye, or Milton Musser? This article follows the interesting and often surprising lives and careers of the men who clerked for the Four Horsemen - Justices Van Devanter, McReynolds, Sutherland, and Butler. These biographical sketches confound easy stereotypes, and prove the adage that law, like politics, can make for strange bedfellows.

World War II Law and Lawyers

Out earlier this summer from the American Bar Association’s publishing arm is World War II Law and Lawyers: Issues, Cases, and Characters, by Thomas J. Shaw, Esq..  According to the ABA’s press release, the book
chronicles the evolving stories of more than 50 major legal issues from that period and profiles more than 300 lawyers and judges from 20 countries involved with related cases and laws.

The book, written by attorney Thomas J. Shaw, presents these legal issues through a global perspective of seven key countries. It presents each issue through the laws or decrees enacted and the people who enacted them. The book also highlights individual cases, spotlights lawyers and judges who were involved in them, and explores how these various factors affected subsequent events, including future conflicts.

The people and personalities depicted in the book — some famous as national or global leaders while others historically obscure — provide a fascinating backdrop to understanding the legal story of the war. Through its content and comprehensive coverage, the book speaks to many different audiences, including those interested in legal research and resources and others keen on better understanding World War II historical figures and filling in their knowledge of the war.

Word War II Law and Lawyers presents a wide perspective of the war period. It details, for instance, how the United States prepared for war as well as how European nations dealt with issues like neutrality, collaboration, annexation and looting of assets. The book also explores how the major Axis powers subverted legal institutions and created a military machine that supported genocide.

New Release: "In the Clutches of the Law: Clarence Darrow's Letters "

The University of California Press has released In the Clutches of the Law: Clarence Darrow's Letters, edited by Randall Tietjen. Cribbing from the UC Press website:
This volume presents a selection of 500 letters by Clarence Darrow, the pre-eminent courtroom lawyer of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Randall Tietjen selected these letters from over 2,200 letters in archives around the country, as well as from one remarkable find—the kind of thing historians dream about: a cache of about 330 letters by Darrow hidden away in the basement of Darrow’s granddaughter’s house. This collection provides the first scholarly edition of Darrow’s letters, expertly annotated and including a large amount of previously unknown material and hard-to-locate letters. Because Darrow was a gifted writer and led a fascinating life, the letters are a delight to read. This volume also presents a major introduction by the editor, along with a chronology of Darrow’s life, and brief biographical sketches of the important individuals who appear in the letters.
A few blurbs:
“Clarence Darrow was an American original: at once idealistic and pragmatic, a hopeful reformer and a hopeless determinist; revered and reviled. In this first-ever comprehensive compilation of Darrow’s wide-ranging personal correspondence, we learn the private side of America’s most celebrated lawyer. This remarkable collection will deepen our understanding of a near-legendary figure.”—Edward J. Larson, Pulitzer Prize winning author of Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America’s Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion

"This is one of the three best books on Clarence Darrow ever published. It stands with the Arthur Weinberg collection of Darrow’s courtroom speeches and Darrow’s autobiography. Tietjen has not only collected letters that provide insight into Darrow’s life and character; he has provided commentary and narrative context that make this book a joy to read.”—Michael E. Tigar, lawyer, Emeritus Professor of Law, Washington College of Law and Duke University
More information is available here.

Bush on Unauthorized Practice of Law in U.S. Economic History

Michael Bush, West Virginia University, has posted From the Great Depression to the Great Recession: (Non-)Lawyers Practicing Law, which is to appear in West Virginia Law Review 115 (2013).  Here is the abstract
In most American jurisdictions, a practitioner of legal services must have a license to practice law. However, history illustrates that economic recessions increase demand to deregulate the legal profession and allow non-lawyers to provide legal services. This article is a defense of licensing requirements for legal services, because the rule of law is too important to a civilized democracy to let it be undermined by quick judgments in the shadows of bad economies. Ultimately, legal services will be governed- by courts, legislatures, a licensed bar, or the free market. However, due to the critical nature of the rule of law in our society, the licensed bar which is bound by ethical duties and minimum competencies, is in the best position to regulate.

Trestman to Lecture on Bessie Margolin

Marlene Trestman, the author of the forthcoming book, Fair Labor: The Remarkable Life and Legal Career of Bessie Margolin, will deliver the Donald S. Shire Lecture at the U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, on Friday, June 28th, 2013.  The lecture, which is open to the public, will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the Department’s César Chávez Memorial Auditorium, which may be accessed via 3rd and C Streets, NW, entrance.  Please RSVP to Patricia Morgan at 202-693-5772 or Morgan.Patricia@dol.gov.

Aaronson on Welfare Rights Lawyering in Reagan's California

Mark N. Aaronson, University of California Hastings College of the Law, has posted Representing the Poor: Legal Advocacy and Welfare Reform During Reagan's Gubernatorial Years, which appears in the Hastings Law Journal 64 (2013): 933-1119.  Here is the abstract:    
The empirical focus of this book-length work is the contentious political and legal battle over California welfare reform in the early 1970s. It is an extended, multifaceted case study of a kind not much found in the literature on social cause lawyering. The narrative highlights the forceful presence of Ronald Reagan and the pivotal role in representing the welfare poor carried out by Ralph Santiago Abascal, a government-funded legal aid attorney. To counter Reagan’s welfare policy ambitions, Abascal with other legal services lawyers, and in joint cause with recipient-led welfare rights organizations, relied on court litigation not in isolation but as part of an overall strategy that also involved legislative and administrative actions. Within the context of American pluralism and constitutionalism and from an analytical perspective, this study examines the professional and institutional character of group legal representation for the poor as a strategy for political empowerment and social change. While grounded in political and legal history, the study’s conceptual approaches primarily draw on ideas from political science and political theory about representation and from writings in legal ethics and legal education on professional role responsibilities. The principal thematic points are: (1) Social cause lawyering is a systemic necessity for the democratic and equitable functioning of our governing institutions; (2) the client constraints on the role of lawyers for groups or causes have more to do conceptually with understandings about the nature of representation than the applicability of ethical or procedural rules; and (3) the political consequences of such legal advocacy are variable and potentially contradictory.

Szalai's "Outsourcing Justice"

Imre Szalai, Loyola University New Orleans College of Law, has just published Outsourcing Justice: The Rise of Modern Arbitration Laws in America, with the Carolina Academic Press:
Arbitration is a method of dispute resolution in which parties agree to submit their dispute to a private, neutral third person, instead of a traditional court with a judge and jury. This private system of arbitration, which is often confidential and secretive, can be a polar opposite, in almost every way, to the public court system.

Over the past few decades, arbitration agreements have proliferated throughout American society. Such agreements appear in virtually all types of consumer transactions, and millions of American workers are bound by arbitration agreements in their employment relationships. America has become an “arbitration nation,” with an increasing number of disputes taken away from the traditional, open court system and relegated to a private, secretive system of justice. How did arbitration agreements become so widespread, and enforceable, in American society? Prior to the 1920s, courts generally refused to enforce such agreements, and parties had the right to bring their disputes to court. However, during the 1920s, Congress and state legislatures suddenly enacted ground-breaking laws declaring that arbitration agreements are “valid, irrevocable, and enforceable.”

Drawing on previously untapped archival sources, this book explores the many different people, institutions, forces, beliefs, and events that led to the enactment of modern arbitration laws during the 1920s, and this book examines why America’s arbitration laws radically changed during this period. By examining this history, this book demonstrates how the U.S. Supreme Court has grossly misconstrued these laws and unjustifiably created an expansive, informal, private system of justice touching almost every aspect of American society and impacting the lives of millions.
A detailed table of contents is here.

Conk, "People's Electric: Engaged Legal Education at Rutgers-Newark Law School in the 1960's and 1970's"

Readers interested in the history of legal education and the activist lawyering of the 1960s and 70s may be interested in the following article: "People's Electric: Engaged Legal Education at Rutgers-Newark Law School in the 1960's and 1970's," by George W. Conk (Fordham Law School). It appeared in Volume 40, no. 503 of the Fordham Urban Law Journal (201). Here's the abstract:
Rutgers-Newark Law School was the most innovative, exciting, and effective law school in the 1960's and 1970's. Civil rights and liberties, 'poverty law', women's rights, employment discrimination, open housing, and public education were the foci of legal education at Rutgers - Which is the State University of New Jersey. In those two decades Rutgers-Newark - which we affectionately called People's Electric - developed a model of engaged legal education that was and is unique.

No other law school of its era - and perhaps since - to my knowledge has been so thoroughly characterized by a broad progressive social agenda. Affirmative action, racial justice, women’s rights, public education, open housing, and civil liberties were the focus of the frequently landmark litigation which originated or was substantially aided by students and faculty from Rutgers Newark.

The unique activism of Rutgers-Newark - a small public law school in an afflicted city - had a huge impact in the development of the law. The activist faculty and the clinics engaged law students deeply in innovative and intense litigation regarding the most important and controversial issues of the day. Students at People’s Electric learned first-hand the law-making function of the courts. They often helped make that law. No other law school in the country can begin to match its record in the 1970's. This was accomplished without endowment, without a base of high ranking or wealthy alumni, without a tradition of such activism at the school, a public law school whose tuition was nominal. Students learned from extraordinarily talented lawyers who they assisted. Their successes showed students how to succeed by really trying. We left Rutgers confident that we knew how to and could change the law, confident that we could make a difference.

Graduates continued the mission in many ways. One outstanding example is the cadre who joined the Office of the Public Defender - a statewide agency - which led or participated in the defense of over two hundred capital trials from 1982-2007 when the death penalty was repealed and replaced with life without parole. There were no executions.
The full article is available here, at SSRN. 

AJLH 53:2

The April 2013 issue of the American Journal of Legal History is out.  Here are the two articles:

Slavery, Executive Power and International Law:
The Haitian Revolution and American Constitutionalism . . . Robert J. Reinstein

The Marketing of Legal Services in the United States, 1855-1912:
A Case Study of Guggenheimer, Untermyer & Marshall
of New York City and the Predecessor Partnerships . . . . .  Richard A. Hawkins

Bessie Margolin (1909-1996)

[My exam in American Legal History usually includes a biographical essay.  The 2012 exam, for example, had one on Marion Harron; the 2011 exam had one on Bernice Lotwin Bernstein, and the 2010 exam profiled Ida Klaus.  For this year's question, I drew heavily upon Marlene Trestman, “Fair Labor: The Remarkable Life and Legal Career of Bessie Margolin (1909-1996)," Journal of Supreme Court History 37 (2012): 42–74, as well as my own research.  See also Karen's essay, Portia's Deal, and her post on the Frankfurter quote below.]

Bessie Margolin (credit)
Bessie Margolin (1909-1996) was born in Brooklyn to Russian Jewish immigrants.  When she was two, the family moved to Memphis, where, when Bessie was four, her mother died in childbirth.  Her father felt incapable of carrying for his children, so Bessie and a brother were sent to live at the Jewish Children’s Home in New Orleans.  There she received an excellent education and was deemed “a very splendid girl, far above average in every way.”  At sixteen she left the Home and enrolled in a women’s affiliate of Tulane University.  After two years she enrolled in Tulane itself to complete her bachelor’s degree and a law degree.  She was the only woman in the Tulane Law School when she started.  She became Civil Law Editor of the Tulane Law Review.  In 1930, at the age of twenty one, she graduated second in her law school class of twenty three, “a fraction” behind the top student.

Margolin impressed Tulane’s dean with her “unusual professional ability,” her “unusually charming personality,” and her “unusually broad, balanced, and progressive social outlook.”  She also impressed the Yale law professor Ernest Lorenzen, who published an article in her volume of the law review and hired her as his research assistant.  She would spend the next three years in New Haven, the last on a prestigious fellowship as a doctoral candidate in law.  Her thesis, directed by William O. Douglas, was on the French law of corporate reorganizations.  Douglas called it meticulous and “of the highest caliber,” with “an air of realism about it.”

While at Yale, Margolin also wrote a comment on pending legislation on corporate reorganizations.  After the Yale Law Journal, edited that year by Abe Fortas, published it over her initials, partners of eminent law firms inquired after its author.  Their interest in a potential hire vanished when they learned that “B.M.” was a woman.  After receiving her legal doctorate in 1933, she took a temporary job at the Inter-American Commission of Women in Washington, where she researched the legal status of women in Latin America.  Then the creation of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) presented her with a better alternative.  Lorenzen assured TVA’s personnel director that Margolin “is intent upon a legal career or professional career as a primary objective from which she will not be deflected by marriage.”

In the late summer of 1933, Margolin started as a research attorney in TVA’s Knoxville office at a salary of only $2,000.  About that time, a TVA lawyer described her telegraphically: “Tulane, Yale, TVA.  One of the Washington ‘prima donnas.’  Excellent on research.  A good kid.  Sadly underpaid and a bit sore on things.”  He predicted that she “will be all right” under the newly appointed general counsel James Lawrence Fly, and in fact Fly promoted her to Associate Attorney and raised her salary to $3,600.

The TVA’s legal division, one of Margolin’s coworkers recalled, was “an extraordinary able, brilliant group of relatively young lawyers, who had outstanding academic records and law school achievements.”  Fly considered his legal division TVA’s central policymaker.  He let it be known, a lawyer recalled, that “the legal division was going to be the key to the works.”

Fly set Margolin to work organizing evidence, researching legal issues, and writing substantial portions of the briefs in two challenges to TVA that went to the U.S. Supreme Court.  Although she can be seen sitting, hatless, behind TVA’s lead counsel John Lord O’Brian, in a photograph of one trial, she never argued in any branch of the cases.  Although Fly promoted her to Senior Attorney and raised her salary to $4600, she only tried a few condemnation cases “of lesser importance.”

In 1939 Margolin moved to the legal staff of the recently created Wage and Hour Division of the Labor Department, charged with implementing the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  She asked for $5600, even though she knew that the general counsel might “think this an awful lot ‘for a girl’”; she was pleased when she received $5000.  Save for six months in 1946, when she was in Germany helping organize trials of Nazis, she remained at Wage & Hour until retiring in 1972.   From the start, she appeared in court.  Her argument of motions in federal district court in New Orleans was extensively covered by the local press.  Margolin is “a brunette, with flashing black eyes and a stunning figure,” a newspaperman reported.  “When you see a face like Miss Margolin’s you almost immediately wonder what that ‘Miss’ is tacked on before for.”  At first, she declined to discuss her marital status.  “I’m interested in labor and I’m a New Dealer,” she said.  “Incidentally, I’m not a radical.”  When pressed, she finally responded that she “hadn’t had time for love.”
   
A few months with time cards and payroll records in damp New England warehouses convinced Margolin that trial work was a “deadly bore,” so she transferred to Wage & Hour’s appellate division.  She would ultimately argue 150 cases before the U.S. Circuit Courts (winning 114) and 28 before the U.S. Supreme Court (winning 23).  Frankfurter, who sparred with her in oral argument, described her as “a very good girl & a good advocate but not a lawyer of unsettling brilliance apart from the deft use of her feminine charms.”  She was promoted to Assistant Solicitor of the Department of Labor, but she never became Solicitor or a federal judge, a post she coveted.  Instead, she remained an imposing presence in the Department of Labor.  One Solicitor described his selection process as having three stages: “I had to be nominated by the President, confirmed by the Senate, and interviewed by Bessie.”

Regular visits to the Elizabeth Arden Salon, during which she sometimes edited briefs, kept her impeccably coiffed.  When she entered a courthouse, “she walked with absolute assurance that a door would be opened before she got to it.”  After the Equal Pay Amendment to the FLSA was passed in 1963, she became its greatest defender within the Department of Labor.

[As you can see, the essay does not mention Margolin's affair with Fly, a married father of two, which commenced at TVA and continued after he became chairman of the Federal Communications Commission in September 1939.  Because I had not discussed sexuality and the legal profession in class, I thought the issue too challenging for students to tackle for the first time in the exam room.  FCC Commissioner Clifford Durr described the affair as "one of these things that was known but wasn’t known."  The chairman of an ad hoc investigation of the FCC threatened to make it public until House Speaker Sam Rayburn (like Fly, a Texan) instructed him not to.]

Lawyers in the WPA's Life Histories Collection

Particularly at the end of the semester, with paper drafts to read and exams to write and grade, one can easily think of teaching and research as a zero-sum game.  This semester I have an antidote in a term-paper-in-progress by one of my students, Elizabeth Hira (Georgetown Law Class of 2013).  Ms. Hira has been working in the “life histories” by the staff of the Federal Writers’ Project of the Works Progress Administration from 1936-1940.  Some “2,900 documents representing the work of over 300 writers from twenty-four states” survive in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division as part of a larger collection, The U.S. Work Projects Administration Federal Writers' Project and Historical Records Survey.

A webpage of at the Library of Congress:
Typically 2,000-15,000 words in length, the documents consist of drafts and revisions, varying in form from narrative to dialogue to report to case history. The histories describe the informant's family education, income, occupation, political views, religion and mores, medical needs, diet and miscellaneous observations.
Only what the Library terms “a coherent portion” of the originals have been digitized, but these include contributions from lawyers, including several African Americans:

James W. Bawser
Charles Rufus Brice
Thomas M. Cathcart
O. H. Cross
James Earl Doolittle
Thomas J. Henry
M. J. Pinkett
Robert Lee Wright

Weekend Roundup

  • The Sanford Herald reports on a new push to preserve North Carolina’s legal history here.
  • The website of the Washington Independent Review of Books has two posts of interest to legal historians.  The first is a review of Justice O’Connor’s latest book (and book tour) by Tony Mauro, the Supreme Court correspondent for the National Law Journal.  The second is an interview of Larry Gibson, Maryland Law and the author of Young Thurgood, The Making of a Supreme Court Justice.
    • If you tuned in to your local public radio station this week, you may have heard Adam Winkler (UCLA) talking about gun control and the history of the Second Amendment. For those who missed it, a short segment from Morning Edition is available here. A longer interview from Forum, a call-in public affairs program based in Northern California, is available here.
    • "The Georgetown Law chapter of the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies will honor the life and legacy of Judge Robert H. Bork with the 10th annual Lifetime Service Award on Tuesday, April 16, 2013, from 6:30 - 8:30 p.m. in the Sport & Fitness Center Lobby, located at 550 First Street, NW, on the Georgetown Law campus. . . .  Interim Dean Gregory E. Maggs of George Washington University Law School will pay tribute to Bork's contributions to the legal profession."
    • Looking for flashcards for an Anglocentric course in New Zealand Legal History?  Try these.
    • From Books&Ideas.net, Jean-Marc Dryfus discusses the opening of the records of the International Tracing Service ("at once a crucial tracing center, a memorial to the victims of Nazi persecution, forced labor and the Holocaust, and a gigantic repository of archives") in Bad Arolsen, Germany (here).
    • In case you missed it, here's the New York Times article on the turn to the study of capitalism in U.S. Departments of History.
    The Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers.

    Norgren's "Rebels at the Bar"

    Jill Norgren, professor emerita at John Jay College and the University Graduate Center, The City University of New York and the author of (among other books) Belva Lockwood: The Woman Who Would be President has recently published Rebels at the Bar: The Fascinating, Forgotten Stories of America's First Women Lawyers with the NYU Press, which is offering the book at a 20 percent discount (Promo code = REBEL13).  We learn from the press:
    In Rebels at the Bar, prize-winning legal historian Jill Norgren recounts the life stories of a small group of nineteenth century women who were among the first female attorneys in the United States. Beginning in the late 1860s, these determined rebels pursued the radical ambition of entering the then all-male profession of law. They were motivated by a love of learning. They believed in fair play and equal opportunity. They desired recognition as professionals and the ability to earn a good living.

    Through a biographical approach, Norgren presents the common struggles of eight women first to train and to qualify as attorneys, then to practice their hard-won professional privilege. Their story is one of nerve, frustration, and courage. This first generation practiced civil and criminal law, solo and in partnership. The women wrote extensively and lobbied on the major issues of the day, but the professional opportunities open to them had limits. They never had the opportunity to wear the black robes of a judge. They were refused entry into the lucrative practices of corporate and railroad law. Although male lawyers filled legislatures and the Foreign Service, presidents refused to appoint these early women lawyers to diplomatic offices and the public refused to elect them to legislatures.

    Rebels at the Bar expands our understanding of both women’s rights and the history of the legal profession in the nineteenth century. It focuses on the female renegades who trained in law and then, like men, fought considerable odds to create successful professional lives. In this engaging and beautifully written book, Norgren shares her subjects’ faith in the art of the possible. In so doing, she ensures their place in history.

    Read more »

    Blog Archive