Here we revisit our prediction of ADSK share prices made in January 2011. We repeat the previous post in Appendix A in order to present our concept of share pricing and refresh the prediction. Overall we expected a healthy growth of the share during the first quarter of 2011 because the underlying model was very stable over the previous year and the trend in the difference between two defining CPI components (the consumer price index of motor vehicle maintenance and repair, MVR, and the index of information technology, hardware and software, IT) had not been changing since 1990.
ADSK(t) = -3.97MVR(t-4) + 2.17IT(t-7) + 35.16(t-1990) + 269.02
Both coefficients are the same, the time trend is slightly lower and the intercept marginally higher. The lags are just one month shorter than in the previous model. Considering noisy data and the uncertainty in the (adjusted) monthly closing price, the original model is extremely stable.
The closing price in November 2010 was $38.2 and December 2010 - $40.68. The model predicted the price to grow to $43 by the end of March 2011. Actually, the price was $43.09, i.e. as predicted.
During the second quarter of 2011, the ADSK share price is expected to grow to the level of $50, if the model will still be applicable. Thus, we will revisit this stock in July 2011.
Figure 1. The predicted and observed share price for ADSK. In 2011Q2 it is expected to grow to the level of $50.
Appendix A When modeling stock prices by decomposition into two CPI components and linear time trend we exercise two time periods: after 1994 and after June 2003. The reason for this separation is simple – the difference between individual CPI components is usually characterized by the presence of several linear trends. When linear trend in the difference between two defining CPI components has a pivot point relevant stock model also has a break in all coefficients. Therefore, we usually prefer to avoid this type of bias and limit our modeling to the period after June 2003 when all turns in many CPI difference did happen after the 2001 recession. This shorter modeling period significantly influences the resolution of the model and we would prefer to use longer time series when possible.
The model for Autodesk (ADSK) is an excellent example of the possibility to extend the modeling period back to 1994. The resulting model has a deterministic character and predicts the share price evolution at a several month horizon. Our model for ADSK is stable over the past year and is defined by expected indices: the consumer price index of motor vehicle maintenance and repair (MVR) and the index of information technology, hardware and software (IT). The latter defining index definitely has tight relations to ADSK.
These two defining CPI components provide the best fit model between June 2010 and December 2010. The MVR coefficient is negative and thus the increasing price of motor vehicle maintenance and repair causes the share price to fall. The IT index has a positive coefficient but the long-term decrease in this index also causes the share to fall. The slope of time trend is positive revealing the price tendency to increase over time. The best-fit 2-C model for ADSK(t) is as follows:
ADSK(t) = -3.97MVR(t-5) + 2.18IT(t-8) + 35.25(t-1990) + 265.90
The predicted and observed curves are presented in Figure 2. The residual error is $4.75 for the period between January 1994 and December 2010. The model provides a relatively good prediction of the share price in the past. Currently, the predicted price shows a strong tendency to rise. One should expect the ADSK price to grow fast in the first quarter of 2011.
Figure 2. Observed and predicted ADSK share prices.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics published new CPI estimates last Thursday (14.04.2011) and we have recalculated the model at the end of the first quarter. The obtained model does not differ much from the previous one:
The MVR index leads the share price by 5 months and the IT one - by 8 months. Figure 1 depicts the overall evolution of the difference between the involved indices. As discussed above, no change in the trend has been observed since 1994. Hence, the final share price model for ADSK should not be biased by the change in the trend.
where t is calendar time.
Figure 1. Evolution of the difference between MVR and IT. No change in the long-term sustainable linear trend is observed.
0 komentar:
Post a Comment