Historians Discuss Duscuss Same-Sex Marriage and VRA Cases
Kenneth Mack, Ellen Fitzpatrick, George Chauncey and Michael Beschloss on the PBS Newshour last week.
Mintz on the Historians' Briefs in Windsor
Over at Inside Higher Ed, Steven Mintz asks, Does History Matter?
At a time when many question the relevance of history, it is noteworthy that the U.S. Supreme Court case that prohibited the federal government from undercutting a state’s decision to extend "the recognition, dignity and protection" of marriage to same-sex couples, hinged on arguments advanced by professional historians.
More
At a time when many question the relevance of history, it is noteworthy that the U.S. Supreme Court case that prohibited the federal government from undercutting a state’s decision to extend "the recognition, dignity and protection" of marriage to same-sex couples, hinged on arguments advanced by professional historians.
More
Historians Weigh in on the Marriage Equality Decisions
George Chauncey has an op-ed in the New York Times (hat tip: H-Law)
Mary Dudziak comments at Balkinization.
Readers may also be interested in these articles from the History News Network:
Mary Dudziak comments at Balkinization.
Readers may also be interested in these articles from the History News Network: